The Content of Standard Economics Courses

306164_364540110257813_132141133497713_1120497_264482052_n
The Content of Standard Economics Courses

Septtember 8, 2014

Economics textbooks are not only written for students. At two critical points in the history of economic thought textbooks have played significant roles in defining the field, not only for what is taught, but more importantly (in terms of real world outcomes) for the understanding of the economy that is used by politicians, policy makers, and the public, when it votes its approval or disapproval of how the government is affecting the economy.

This started in the 1890s, when Alfred Marshall wrote the first edition of his text, called Principles of Economics. It went through 8 editions, the last being published in 1920. For a large part of the English-speaking world Marshall’s textbook continued to define the field (especially the microeconomics basics) until the middle of the 20thcentury, when it was replaced by Paul Samuelson’s Economics (first published in 1948). That set the standard for about the next 60 years.

These textbooks have not only defined economics for students, they also set clear standards for how people in general should think about the economy, having great influence on government policies and also on the economic research that supports policy. Samuelson was well aware of the impact of his texts, saying in an introduction, “I don’t care who writes a nation’s laws – or crafts its advanced treaties – if I can write its economics textbooks.” Every year about 5 million people in the U.S. graduate from college having taken at least one economics course. These courses, and the textbooks that shape them, in turn contribute to a shared understanding of how things work in the world – and to a general consensus on whose voices will be heard on economic subjects.
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hitler Comparisons Shut Down Any Reasoned Discussions, Demonize All Those Who Challenge US Hegemony, to Ratchet Up Tensions…

Hitler Comparisons Shut Down Any Reasoned Discussions, Demonize All Those Who Challenge The US Hegemony, To Ratchet Up Tensions, …

Post Categories: Canada
Danny Schechter, ICH / The 4th Media News | Monday, September 8, 2014, 14:44 Beijing

Bring Back Adolf: Needed, A New Furor About the Führer

New York: The ISIS gang makes great enemies. They dress in black, wear Halloween masks, wave flags, act viciously, and cut off the heads of journalists.

Never mind that the Saudis beheaded ten dissidents on the night that Jack Foley became their first victim. We didn’t know the Saudi victims and didn’t want to embarrass our ally, but chop people we do know, and you are asking for a drone up your keister.

Nothing like a grotesque atrocity to pump up Joe Biden to vow to “chase ISIS to the gates of hell,” a war cry designed to get the Christian right behind him since the IS detests Jesus too. Barack Obama’s vow to destroy and “degrade” ISIS did not have the same populist appeal.

Every evangelical activist who has been singing “Onward Christian Soldiers” has a new cause now, even if ISIS’ last victim was an Israeli-American.

Never mind the role we may have played in training and funding this latest face of Islamic terror; they have managed to do what  few maniacs have—unite Iran and the US on the field of battle. Their scary presence has also buried all discussion of the failures of US policy that destroyed Iraq and assisted their emergence.
Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Infamous Government Order Mandating Forced Haircuts for American Indian (Indigenous) and Orders Banning Potlatches and Giveaways

By Rebecca Onion

Commissioner of Indian Affairs William Atkinson Jones sent this letter to superintendents of all federal reservations and agencies in January 1902. The notorious missive soon became known as the “haircut order.”

Jones observed that many Native Americans continued to wear their hair long, to “paint,” and to participate in tribal dances. The commissioner objected to these traditions on a number of grounds, arguing that dancing and feasting were “simply subterfuges to cover degrading acts and to disguise immoral purposes,” that painting caused people to go blind, and that long hair simply was not “in keeping with the advancement they are making … in civilization.”

Jones suggested that superintendents could induce compliance by holding back rations and required a report on the progress of these efforts by June 30, 1902.

News of the letter and its contents made national news, with many observers outraged at the order. In the Harper’s Weekly’s edition of Feb. 8, 1902, the anonymous editors wrote a paragraph that was supportive of the Native Americans’ practices, if grossly condescending:

The red man has neither newspapers, letters, books, nor games to break the monotony of his life. He loves company. He gets all his news, all his pleasures, in daily contact with his fellows. He has always lived in a village.

Rather than being forced to submit to “government shears,” the editors argued, the young Native American should be “educated along the line of his natural aptitudes, teach him to adapt to new conditions step by step.”

This type of outcry, coupled with even worse publicity after a few supervisors used harsh methods to enforce Jones’ order, caused the Bureau of Indian Affairs to back down. New directives advised agents that they should use persuasion and example, rather than force, to get Native Americans to dress like “citizens.”

The bureau tried for decades to eliminate ceremonial dances. By the 1920s, however, more and more tribes held annual gatherings based on these traditions, which survived despite the BIA’s disapproval.

Letter 1

Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment