STTPML Collective on 9-11

We at STTPML, as Indigenous veterans of the U.S. military and/or government service, include amongst us experienced pilots and instructors as well as investigators. We know from experience, that even if a small Cessna 150 or a homebuilt crashes, there will be a NTSB investigation that may wind-up in the millions of dollars depending upon the circumstances. Why? Because simply causes and contributing conditions need to be established, lessons need to be learned, to save lives in the present and the future. It is that simple.

What are we to think then, when there is an unprecedented and highly coordinated terrorist attack, involving four coordinated hijackings and unprecedented breaches of airport security, the first of its kind on U.S. soil (Hawaii was not a U.S. state and thus not fully illegally annexed), with unprecedented losses of lives and property, and yet the Bush Administration refuses an independent and comprehensive (no-fear-no-favor) investigation of any kind? What are we to think when an investigation is finally ordered, due to the activism of some of the families of the victims of 9-11 attacks, only an initial $14 million, later expanded to $44 million (less than 1/2 of that spent on Clinton’s abuses of power and hypocrisy)? What are we to think that the first chairman of the proposed 9-11 Commission was Henry Kissinger who withdrew his name, from his office, when one of the “Jersey Girls” widows of 9-11 victims asked him if his firm had any clients with the last name bin Laden?

We do not deal in “conspiracy theories” except in the search for conspiracy facts. That conspiracies really do exist in many places we know from experience, the fact that there are laws against various forms of conspiracy (Title 18 USC 4, 73, 241, 242,…) and many people in jail, some former congressmen, judges, lawyers, police, convicted of being elements of them. Conspiracy, from the Latin to “breathe together”, means simply: a) two or more persons; b) forming a common plan to pursue objectives and engage in activities they know or the law assumes they should know, to be criminal and illegal; c) taking at least one affirmative step in furtherance of the common plan and its objectives (the plan may not have to be completed only  one material step in its furtherance); d) revealing intent or mens rea and coordination of the participants may be established with pattern and network analyses, hearsay rule exceptions  absent outright confessions (circumstantial evidence); e) statutes of limitations apply to termination of the common plan efforts not when objectives are completed;
Continue reading →