Brzezinski Interview
The Brzezinski Interview with Le Nouvel Observateur (1998)
Translated from the French by William Blum and David N. Gibbs. This translation appeared in Gibbs, “Afghanistan: The Soviet Invasion in Retrospect,”International Politics 37, no. 2, 2000. For article full text, click here.
Original French version appeared in “Les Révélations d’un Ancien Conseilleur de Carter: ‘Oui, la CIA est Entrée en Afghanistan avant les Russes…’” Le Nouvel Observateur [Paris], January 15-21, 1998.
Note that all ellipses appeared in the original transcript, as published in Le Nouvel Observateur.
Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs that the American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahiddin in Afghanistan six months before the Soviet intervention. Is this period, you were the national securty advisor to President Carter. You therefore played a key role in this affair. Is this correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahiddin began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention [emphasis added throughout].
Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into the war and looked for a way to provoke it?
B: It wasn’t quite like that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Q : When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against secret US involvement in Afghanistan , nobody believed them . However, there was an element of truth in this. You don’t regret any of this today?
B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter, essentially: “We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.” Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war that was unsustainable for the regime , a conflict that bought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported Islamic fundamentalism, which has given arms and advice to future terrorists?
B : What is more important in world history? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some agitated Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q : “Some agitated Moslems”? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today…
B: Nonsense! It is said that the West has a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid: There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner, without demagoguery or emotionalism. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is t h ere in com m on among fundamentalist Saudi Arabia , moderate Morocco, militarist Pakistan, pro-Western Egypt, or secularist Central Asia? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries…
Additional Sources:
The memoirs referred to in the interview are Robert M. Gates, From the Shadows: The Ultimate Insider’s Story of Five Presidents and How They Won the Cold War (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996), pp. 143-49. Written by a former CIA director, this book first revealed the covert support for the Mujahiddin, prior to the invasion.
Washington Post correspondent Steve Coll downplays the significance of the CIA operation. He presents declassified documents from Brzezinski that express deep concern about the Soviet invasion. According to Coll, the documents “show no hint of satisfaction” from Brzezinski, regarding the invasion. These facts leave two possibilities: The first is that Brzezinski was simply falsifying or distorting in his 1998 interview, in which he implies that he did express satisfaction at the Soviet invasion and the prospect of giving the Soviets their own Vietnam. The second possibility is that the documents referred to by Coll are only part of the story and that other documents, awaiting declassification, corroborate Brzezinski’s 1998 statements.
See Steve Coll, Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001 (New York: Penguin, 2004), pp. 50-51, 581, footnote 17.
Connect the Dots: https://sttpml.org/some-research-materials-documents-and-sources-imperial-penetration-co-optation-control-systems-engineering-and-regime-change/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7YTyilvoWU
See also: https://sttpml.org/fuck-the-e-u-u-s-social-systems-engineering-masks-and-its-covert-puppeteers/
Questions for the readers:
1) Does the Ukraine not have a constitution that allows for orderly impeachment, removal with cause of an alleged kleptocrat or despot?
2) What would happen if some official of say the Government of China or Russia were to come to and be photographed publicly speaking and endorsing the sentiments about capitalism and the U.S. Government at a Occupy Wall Street Movement demonstration?
3) What if those officials were caught on American soil on tape plotting how to rig an upcoming election and whom they want ths new “independent” and “sovereign” government?
4) Why are these two arrogant two-faced imperialist thugs still employed in government “service”?
5) Anyone remember Granada and the “reason” given for the invasion that just “coincidently” also resulted in regime change that had been called for for some time? The reason given was to rescue and protect some poor American medical students supposedly in danger. The real reason was regime change and newspaper headline change from the recent bombing of Marine barracks and loss of 241 marines who had been sent with no mission, no cover and no exit strategy (note according to Gordon Thomas in his book Gideon’s Spies 6th edition, Israel had advance warning of the attack and did not pass it on) Perhaps the accusations against Russia are an example of “Freudian Projection”?